This contrast illustrates the two opposing theories of Pope's time about the Human being: benevolism Man as a creature that tends to the good and the Hobberian ideas about Man as a wolf, as an evil, egoistical creature.
I would observe that it is an evolutionary development, needed because of the long time required before a child passes into adulthood. The poem is divided into four epistles and consists of heroic couplets, which are rhyming lines made up of five iambs.
In parts superior what advantage lies! Unfortunately, these studies were flawed indefinitely. At the core of this argument is the idea that humans must understand themselves as pieces in a great puzzle; the value of each person and animal comes from their relationship with each other.
Overview of the Poem An Essay on Man consists of four epistles, which is a term that is historically used to describe formal letters directed to a specific person.
This idea of the 'Great Chain of Being' was a popular medieval and Renaissance one, very familiar in their day to both Chaucer and Shakespeare. Horace in his work satires the human race, Persius reveals angry in his portrayal of man, and Juvenal is cynical in his approach, because he hates and dislikes mankind.
This ruse was totally successful and the poem was so highly acclaimed that when Pope finally admitted his authorship on the publication of the fourth epistle in Januaryit was difficult for the critics to recant. In the edition of Lettres philosophiques published in that year, he wrote: "The Essay on Man appears to me to be the most beautiful didactic poem, the most useful, the most sublime that has ever been composed in any language.
Different examples of this idea can be pointed out in Pope's poem: All Nature is but art, unknown to thee All chance, direction, which thou canst not see; All discord, harmony not understood; All partial evil, universal good: And, spite of pride, in erring reason's spite, 3 One truth is clear, 'Whatever is, is right'.